10751 The Holder family in Maryland lays out a quarter acre Victory Garden during World War II. Most of the gardening work is done by Grandpa Holder and his teenage grandchildren Rick and Amy and from the looks of the film, it’s backbreaking. There’s the “early” garden of peppers, tomatoes, pole beans, potatoes, asparagus and sweet corn. Then, there’s the late garden with beets, squash, late potatoes, late cabbage, kale, collard greens and three rows of turnips. To save gasoline, they use a horse and plow and humble farm implements. It’s anything but organic. We’re see every kind of pest, worm and disease that can affect the garden. Rick sprays various noxious looking chemicals on the vegetables without wearing a face mask or gloves. “A victory garden is like a share in an airplane factory,” the film’s opening tells us. It’s also a “vitamin factory” that will keep Americans strong. The film ends on a patriotic note—“No Work, No Victory!—Bear that in mind all you Victory Gardeners and Work! For Victory!” A no-nonsense, non-idealized look at what it’s like to have to really grow your own food. No Work, No Victory! Marysz 2004-03-23 20:15:27 2004-03-23 20:15:27 4 Well, at least this movie is more plausible then the the ridiculous 'Gardening' (also found on this site). A family decided to grow it's oen garden because of food rations, and just about grows everything under the sun (literally). Tomatoes! Watermelon! Corn! Collard Greens! Who on earth grows collard greens? Anyways, at least this is more indepth about how to plant these and the care it takes to cultivate these. It also shows us the many, many pests that can harm these and shows us how to deal with them (no bug stamping this time!) Very interesting. The Constant Gardener 4 Bill T. 2005-08-30 22:14:26 2005-08-30 22:14:26 So, I am 50 years old. Both of my parents lived to be in their 90's - we survived this kind of gardening just fine, chemicals and all. My father grew victory gardens during both wars, and we had a 2 acre garden year round when I was growing up. I would not be so quick to judge the chemicals used - most were far less dangerous than the "RoundUp" that homeowners use around their property for weed control today, not to mention the chemicals that commercial growers use. Organic is better, but it is FAR more labor intensive to always be vigilant over pest control - one day looking away can wipe out your whole garden. Interesting Victory Garden Video RHM94611 2008-04-22 00:17:26 2008-04-22 00:17:26 5 I'm not an anti-pesticide fanatic, but it's simply incorrect to suggest that '40s pesticides were less dangerous than modern stuff. In the '40s, it was common to use phosphorus compounds, arsenic compounds, nicotine compounds, thallium bait, DDT and other complex organics that we now know are neurotoxins, carcinogens/mutagens, environmentally persistent/accumulative, etc. on food-bearing ground, directly on food crops and animals, or where they would be drained/washed/flushed into watercourses that later would be utilized as public water supplies, for irrigation of food-bearing ground, or for food fishing. Modern rules and practices have made a difference, generally for the better. Garden chemicals JWilly48519 2009-04-25 23:19:53 2009-04-25 23:19:53 3 4 4.00